This gallery contains 50 photos.
« Truth resides in every human heart, and one has to search for it there, and to be guided by truth as one sees it. But no one has a right to coerce others to act according to … Continue reading
I found out that ya’ll want to see Ewa Sonnet nude, or better put you want to see her pussy. Well here’s your chance! XD
And she ain’t laughing about it, simply because she can’t! He he he!
« Do not scorn a weak cub for he may become the brutal tiger. »
Kindest regards,
♫ d(｡◕‿◕｡)b ♪♪
PS: My words are my own, my actions are my own. Everything I wrote and did in this post are my own responsibility. All I’m offering is: YAP! 
«Everything we do (in life) is meaningless, without the appropriate conviction.»
PS: This post was « queued up » in advance!
It seems to me that a certain $FPOCA has a major crush on a certain mom! And as a result of that, got our Facebook page torn down yesterday!? It won’t matter anyhow. because you’ve only given us more fuel to continue on and on and on and on, just you wait!?
Which is why, I feel compelled to make my 100th post on wordpress.com all the more special!
So let’s start with a nice slideshow!
^ Yep, that about sums it up just nicely! 
Now for some pseudo-code:
ES="Ewa Sonnet" TRESH="$ES is a person: Who is \« Very Allergic \» to any \ \“ self-reflective \” criticism, which is why we're here!
The resulting output:
Ewa Sonnet is a person: Who is « Very Allergic » to any “ self-reflective ” criticism, which is why we’re here!
As I wrote yesterday on my tumblr:
(And the whole reason and point of me reblogging this here.)
I’m sorry I didn’t had the time before, to respond any sooner! Since I’ve a life to live too. I don’t “ hate ” the deluded woman who goes by the ‘artistic’ name of Ewa Sonnet, but who in reality is named Beata Dąbrowska. It’s, beyond a reasonable doubt, what she represents that I hate, resent and detest. Coupled with the things I know and which have been said behind the scenes.
This is so unlike me who simply posts his expressions publicly. Dangerous? Well maybe, but that time has come where diplomacy has failed (and we HAVE TRIED!). That subtle hints have fallen on deaf ears. And to {make,complicate} matters even more. Us (former fans) simply not being allowed to speak or comment freely on their wall!?
IMHO: There’s a BIG difference in simply posting negative sounding comments (I’d remove those too!) and not wanting to be reminded of «an inconvenient» truth. A truth more and more people are going to hear about and if they care enough share with others!? Then they will start to ask their own questions too. What are you going to do, if this happens?
- Block those people as well!?
- Report their profiles for being fake, like you did with my girlfriend’s profile or perhaps you let one of your goons do that for you!?
- Message their SO(s) and talk trash about theirs!? This all in order to “ dissect ” a happy and innocent relationship!? <- I believe there’s a special seat reserved in hell for peepz who do so!?
Honestly: I’ve had it with the bullshit!
Of course, then there’s the “ baseless accusation ” of this group being part of … or much simpler a bunch of ‘nolife’ having “ creative terrorists ”!? I’m sure and I know I’m not speaking for just myself here, but we all do have our own lives to attend to.
PS: « Wie niet horen wil…, moet maar voelen. »
And finish this post with both a gallery and a download link to the photos used for this post!
Now we understand why this set will never be released.
« Bitch Please » …
Just for laughs! XD
« To go along with all the fake updates of Ewa Sonnet’s social networks (latest update is from august2012), here is a New promo for her New update from her failed album. »
« Sometimes changing perspectives changes everything » …
Someone should be humble and learn to take advice, like {he,she} takes a Dick! :@)
Does this look like the self-proclaimed: « Classy, well mannered, very disciplined and “ world famous ” model »? Who’s known by her project-name’s alter-ego of “ Ewa Sonnet ”
Nah, I don’t think so either… Or was she just having a bad day that day and the camera just happened to “ immortalize ” this moment for “ eternity ”…? If so, then you just ran out of luck here, ’cause the whole ‘verse is going to know this “ endearing moment ” too!
« All I’m offering is the truth … »
Then again: These are just some (random) thoughts…
That’s all folks!
Kindest regards,
♫ d(｡◕‿◕｡)b ♪♪
PS: My words are my own, my actions are my own. Everything I wrote and did in this post are my own responsibility. All I’m offering is: YAP!
«Everything we do (in life) is meaningless, without the appropriate conviction.»
It’s your first impression: &laqou; When you put your unedited work out there, that’s what they see as your business-model, basically. And when you have your work edited and perfected, it will be better for you. »
^ So basically, never let your client see your unedited work. Good Advice.
…Now at least you know why I’ve pulled all my posts. Not because I’m against nudity or anything remotely related to the subject. I.e. I’m not a choir boy either. However, I’m a big proponent of informed consensus. Which to me applies to more areas in life than for example an area of life, what some of you might call “sleazy” GWC fauxtography.
I said to be continued in my previous post, and as I do tend to keep my promises. So here it is…
As the good Facebooker that I am, I’ve my fair share of apps I use regularly either on – or off FB that is. Now I happened to stumble upon this article yesterday. <- Maybe this’ll explain to my readers, why I’ve the need to write about these subject(s).
FWIW: I neither agree nor disagree with the author.
Why? Because at first I’d interpret this ad as: As taken from real life. Whether this is a grim reality (as portrayed rather effectively in the accompanying pictures) for those involved or not. It is there whether you like it or not. And yes it doesn’t sell, simply because it doesn’t appeal (to a regular person). In short: a more honest storytelling doesn’t sell, or… does it?
What fascinates me, is the need for fairy-tale-telling and the preferred realness of phantasy. Yes I know how marketing works and yes I do know how to sell ‘things’ [except for myself of course. ] Thus I can understand and even appreciate a well lit, better styled and better clothed model(s) in a prearranged setting more, than the portrayed “zef-side” here. Why? Because I know it takes time to set up the right props in the setting of your choosing with the lighting of your choosing. <- A professional artist could give you a better description of how this works properly, more than I can.
Q: So why all of a sudden have you decided to go on what appears to be «a crusade» against declining moral?
A: No, I haven’t!? Or what makes you think that I do… I’ll repeat here what I’ve stated so many times before. In order to organize my thoughts and feelings about whatever subject I’m writing about. I have the need to write about it. As such I tend to view my writings as merely descriptions of whatever it is what’s currently on my mind. Needless to say perhaps, but I do tend to write off (to be taken literally as well as figuratively) what’s on my chest and move on thereafter…
Q: So it’s a matter of moral vs morale?
A: That’s exactly right! It’s not like I’m in the perfect position to pass judgment on or about what other people do. But this doesn’t prevent me from expressing my stance on the matter, nor should I ever feel dissuaded in doing so.
Q: So what is your stance on the matter?
A1: It should be self-evident that I clearly view photography and fauxtography as two separate entities with only one common denominator, namely the use of a camera.
A2: As a result of this separation of privileges, I discern strongly in between one aspect of photography which causes astonishment, awe or insert any other feeling not necessarily related to sexuality and the other which has the simple goal of causing physical arousal. Please note: I do tend to view neither of them as neither right nor wrong. <- But confusing, yes to say the least…
A3: As I hinted at before. If both (or more) parties involved have a gay old time doing the things they both love to do best, then who am I to disrupt such plays.
As I posted on facebook!
"'Amateur' sleaze is a tired aesthetic in this age of air-brushed nostalgia"
~ Indeed it is! Unfortunately however this could be more true for those who work in this particular niche than others who don't.
Perhaps to be continued as well… But after Easter that’s for sure…
Kindest regards,
PS: My words are my own, my actions are my own. Everything I wrote and did in this post are my own responsibility. All I’m offering is: YAP!
«Everything we do (in life) is meaningless, without the appropriate conviction.»
I’m sure some of my regular readers will have noticed that I’ve pulled away all (if not most) post I had on my blog regarding the luscious illusion called ES by some and TRES by others.
«It's the smell, ...»
Of course I’ve my reasons, of which here is one that should stand out, for this as well.
Since I have it on good authority, that all criticism is gratefully received. I’m sure ‘she’ won’t mind me telling you my POV now.
«Q: What's that? - A: Good authority.»
First things first though. Let me state that I’ve no grudge or ill will towards the referred to person!
Q: She has become a «persona non grata» then?
A: Nah, not really. I believe it suffices to say that I got «sucker punched» last year into believing that I was dealing with the real thing.
Q: Why is that you say?
A: Well… let’s for example take this sample from one of her interviews she did for CKM in 2005 (or 2006 I’m not certain.):
Dzięki tej pracy mogę, przynajmniej na razie, dokładać do kariery wokalnej.
Thanks to this work I can, at least for now, add to a vocal career.
^ All this plus based on my own interactions with her, led me to believe that I was dealing with a sweet and kind young Polish woman, who wanted nothing more than to earn a few extra bucks, so she could pick up her singing career again. A career which she had parted with as of late 2007?
Lately however I’ve come to believe everything referring to this noble and worthy goal has been nothing more than an elaborate and rather ingenious way to promote only that which would give her those bucks in the first place. Now I’ll ask you this! Wouldn’t it have been simpler to simply say so! In order to save me and possibly many others the time and effort to help you promote yourself back into good graces on all available social media sites out there. Please note: I did just say «I believe this to be the case»! One of the many grounds I base this believe on is the complete lack of any new singing material being put forth. Rather as a former VIP member of this so called hidden group, I’ve only been shown a new and upcoming amateur starlet for busty.pl and an increasing desire to promote her on behalf of ES onto sites you wouldn’t want anything to do with.
Q: What sites do you mean?
A: The type which seem populated by nothing other than the misogynistic type of people who seem to get a kick out of demeaning and degrading women in favor of a few bucks they seem to earn by being a so called “affiliate” to this or that {soft,hard}core website. Honestly though, while I’m the type of person who would say: «Whatever floats your boat as long as it doesn’t sink mine.» (Which is BTW: an interesting way of saying “to live and let live”) But if you expect me to believe this to refer to her, or even that this bears her seal of approval, well think again because I {sincerely,highly} doubt it. <- Then again: That’s just me, what do I know right…!?
Which is why, among things, I have for you a bunch of recent posts:
(To peruse through, at a time of your leisure.)
^ As a last: Isn’t it amazing how much some, emotional charged attempt at persuasion, message appears to spark me to write so much.
As a last I’ve no intend to start a smear campaign or even consider to start one. Honestly, I’ve got better things to do with my time! The posts I’ve recently written up are nothing more than an attempt on my part to fathom or an attempt to understand why people do the things they do. This without implying this is currently being done. Because that would constitute slander or libel on my part. 
What I want is for people to make up their own minds in regards to their dealings with either me or for example the woman I’ve tried my best at to put in the bests of light possible ever since last year.
Now at least you know why I’ve pulled all my posts. Not because I’m against nudity or anything remotely related to the subject. I.e. I’m not a choir boy either. However, I’m a big proponent of informed consensus. Which to me applies to more areas in life than for example an area of life, which some of you might call the “sleazy” GWC fauxtography niche. Which some might unjustly equate to good photography. <- The only resemblance it has with professional photography is the use of a camera, nothing more.
^ The latter topic is also worthy to write about.
To be continued…
Kindest regards,
PS: My words are my own, my actions are my own. Everything I wrote and did in this post are my own responsibility. All I’m offering is: YAP!
«Everything we do (in life) is meaningless, without the appropriate conviction.»
As the big fan of wordplay that I am. Today I am going to point out the ambiguousness of the English language. A feat. both loved and hated by myself.
Thus this link is for Your amusement and entertainment only:
http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Innuendo
^ Note: Not for the serious or the weak!
Since I believe it is always best to talk through images instead of text only. Because text only, sincerely leaves to much room for other interpretations.
Then again: What’s it like.
Time for a break, no!?
Speaking of WOKs and my sincere dislike for having to type to much. Especially when this concerns me to have to churn out several tidbits or chunks of pure html in my posts.
This ‘global.xml’ snippet will only work in Gedit though.
(But I felt like sharing anyway. 
)
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<snippets>
<snippet>
<text><![CDATA[<abbr title="$1">$2</abbr>$0]]></text>
<tag>abbr</tag>
<description>abbr</description>
</snippet>
<snippet>
<text><![CDATA[<a target="_blank" title="$1" href="$2">$3</a>$0]]></text>
<tag>ablank</tag>
<description>ablank</description>
</snippet>
<snippet>
<text><![CDATA[<acronym title="$1">$2</acronym>$0]]></text>
<tag>acro</tag>
<description>acro</description>
</snippet>
<snippet>
<text><![CDATA[<a title="$1" href="$2">$3</a>$0]]></text>
<tag>ahref</tag>
<description>ahref</description>
</snippet>
<snippet>
<text><![CDATA[<a title="$1">$2</a>$0]]></text>
<tag>atitle</tag>
<description>atitle</description>
</snippet>
<snippet>
<text><![CDATA[<blockquote>
$1
</blockquote>
$0]]></text>
<tag>bq</tag>
<description>blockquote</description>
</snippet>
<snippet>
<text><![CDATA[<h4>$1</h4>
$0
]]></text>
<tag>chap</tag>
<description>chap</description>
</snippet>
<snippet>
<text><![CDATA[<em>$1</em>$0]]></text>
<tag>em</tag>
<description>em</description>
</snippet>
<snippet>
<text><![CDATA[#!/bin/bash
# Modified: Today by E.L.F.
#
## This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under
## the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software
## Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later
## version.
#
## This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
## ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS
## FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more
## details.
#
## You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with
## this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51
## Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA.
## http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html
#
## Script-name - $GEDIT_FILENAME
#
]]></text>
<tag>gpl</tag>
<description>gpl</description>
</snippet>
<snippet>
<text><![CDATA[<li>$1</li>
$0
]]></text>
<tag>li</tag>
<description>li</description>
</snippet>
<snippet>
<text><![CDATA[<ol>
$1
</ol>
$0]]></text>
<tag>ol</tag>
<description>ol</description>
</snippet>
<snippet>
<text><![CDATA[<p>$1</p>
$0]]></text>
<tag>p</tag>
<description>p</description>
</snippet>
<snippet>
<text><![CDATA[“$1”$0]]></text>
<tag>q</tag>
<description>q</description>
</snippet>
<!-- The spacing in between source and code is deliberate! -->
<snippet>
<text><![CDATA[1
$1
$0
[/source code]]]></text>
<tag>wp</tag>
<description>source</description>
</snippet>
<snippet>
<text><![CDATA[<strong>$1</strong>$0]]></text>
<tag>strong</tag>
<description>strong</description>
</snippet>
<snippet>
<text><![CDATA[<sub>$1</sub>$0]]></text>
<tag>sub</tag>
<description>sub</description>
</snippet>
<snippet>
<text><![CDATA[<sup>$1</sup>$0]]></text>
<tag>sup</tag>
<description>sup</description>
</snippet>
<snippet>
<text><![CDATA[<ul>
$1
</ul>
$0]]></text>
<tag>ul</tag>
<description>ul</description>
</snippet>
</snippets>
That’s all folks!
Kindest regards,
PS: My words are my own, my actions are my own. Everything I wrote and did in this post are my own responsibility. All I’m offering is: YAP!
«Everything we do (in life) is meaningless, without the appropriate conviction.»
For one I’ve been brushing up on my command of the bash shell. Also I’ve become strangely addicted to playing sudoku. 
<– That would be at every opportunity I get people.
Testing out ‘new’ wordpress features, such as publishing this post by email. At the same time I am learning how to utilise my blog better. <– Why? – I’ll tell you up ahead.
Post by Email is a way of publishing posts on your blog by email. Any email client can be used to send the email, allowing you to publish quickly and easily from devices such as cell phones.
Well for one: After reading Mr. McNeil’s blog from page 1 to 5 and back. I am somewhat humbled!! Now, why is that you might ask? Well, while I have written about Ewa Sonnet at a few occasions before. Namely: here and again there. I do feel I should do a tad more than writing the occasional post such as this one.
Which as a matter of fact brings me back to the “learning wordpress” part again. In particular what I want to write about more in general. Perhaps I am having a bit of a crisis here? I mean in the past I had another blog on which in retrospect I was a wee bit too open for my own good. Of course I had my reasons to do this as well. One of those was: In order to grow as a person I’d have to make myself somewhat more vulnerable, i.e. confront myself with my weaker points and learn from those. Did I succeed, one might ask? *Output omitted*
So while I have had a change of heart in how to deal with my own dealings, perhaps I should simply have bought me a personal diary for that back then? Do people take advantage of people who have their tongue up their sleeve, like me? Who say anything they want or like out there in the open. They might have wanted too I suppose!? But remember the part where I hinted at growing stronger. In short it does have that cleansing effect on a person, let there be no doubt about that! But as you might have guessed by now I won’t be doing any of the sorts in this fashion any time soon.
Which brings me once again back to the question of what am I supposed to blog about? In order to aid me in this quest I a while back created this blog (beginning of 2010). In which I had the firm resolve to write tutorials and the likes for G.Linux users such as me. I know how much I’ve benefited from other people’s expertise over the years, therefore it is only logical to assume or to expect perhaps that I’d go that direction as well. And so I have and for a while it was good.
Then one day in March this year I was curious about a certain website I used to have had a subscription for, I believe that to be from 2004 to 2006 if memory serves correctly and it suffices to say that its duration back then is irrelevant. In short I went to that website and found out that Ewa Sonnet had started out on Her ‘new conquest’ to take over the world once again with nothing but Her charm, Her smile, Her lovely singing voice, Her work ethos and of course last but not the least: Her other assets…
^^ As for that last bit you’ll have to find out for yourself by subscribing to the Website which kick-started Her career in the first place. Because believe it or not (because my stats regarding busty.pl postings don’t lie.). I can only talk about, write about and say how lucky I am for being one of Her fans and all that, but: “No, I can not give car” <– Then we might as well buy them. *Exactly* Fwiw: I’ve already chosen my path. As an added bonus and perhaps (added) incentive I might just choose to write more often about the wondrous woman who goes by the name of Ewa Sonnet.
Why you might ask? To get my brownie points…? <– And become part of the large grey masses while doing so? No I’d rather stand out from the crowd.
To get special deals and discounts (a tempting offer, if it existed, but no can’t do.). (^See above for a similar explanation.) A sort of the more I write the more I get idea? <– Well, I might want to ask myself sincerely what it is I could possible gain from such a posture!? Not much I can guarantee you. I might even get banned from wordpress if I did! Now why would I want to do that? I mean I have paid for my domain name, I’ve made certain that ads aren’t shown on my blog. As a courtesy to the casual reader, who like me, don’t want distracting ads to appear on pages of his/her choosing.
To get back on topic! What do I want to write about which won’t make people ‘oggle’ at my blog and go tsk tsk, or what are these pieces of code doing here, I don’t understand. *Eyes pop* I think that in the end it won’t matter, because there will always be people who don’t approve of what I do (or don’t). So why should I even try to live up to any, if existing, expectation of me as blogger. I can’t please everyone, nor should I desire to do so.
To be continued… Why? Well I think I’ve spent more than enough words and the accompanying sentences describing my desire to get back in the blogging saddle again for tonight. As for Ewa Sonnet I believe it suffices to say that I wish Her all the best and would love to see Her make a Huge Come Back. She deserves to be at least treated with the same amount of respect as She has for example shown me over the past few months on Facebook and other places.
Kindest regards,
From a dedicated fan.
PS: Comments allowed (those (if any) will be {monitored,moderated} by yours truly) _AND_ these will have to relate to what I might call “state-related”!
I interrupt my regular broadcast or routine of posting snippets of code. To talk about something completely different.
Women! *Yay*
As fans of Ewa Sonnet already know so well she is at this moment competing with tons of other very pleasing girls for the goal of becoming Playboy miss social and possibly become a featurette of the same named magazine? All of this is happening as we speak on facebook.com at an app called playboymisssocial.
Therefore I ask of you: Do you want to see Ewa Sonnet appear in playboy? If yes then please do so at the place where she posted this same question!?
Now I do not know Ewa Sonnet personally. So what do I know? Or why write about her at all!?
Well when I first ‘met’ her (and her looks) on the net. I was under the impression that this was all she did. Soon after I found out that besides modeling and making full use of her looks. That she also sings, dances on ice and is truly a very pleasant person to interact with on facebook.
The problem and hence one of the major reasons why I am writing this all up (which is quite an impulsive act on my part I might add) is the following. If one were to look up info about Ewa Sonnet then one is automatically confronted with what I gently nudged at, at the beginning of the previous paragraph. I daresay that I am quite capable of remaining fairly objective (I am human after all!) and as such am quite capable in discerning a playful act from a willful truth. I also know about the effect ‘stigmatization’ can have on one’s career.
So what am I trying to affect here: My perception of beautiful glamor models in general? Done! Your perception (if applicable) of either e.g. Ewa Sonnet or any other woman who started out in a similar fashion: Mission impossible i.e. not going to happen. But what I did try to do while writing this is to highlight more than one aspect of her person and perhaps make you (if applicable) the casual visitor (re)think {his,her} stratagem?
As for negative criticism either on this post or more in general. Ignoruj! … or at least that was the name of the label put on one of those fancy buttons I once saw while chatting at polchat.pl
Kindest regards,
Alex
