The earthquake in Japan made Earth spin slightly faster by changing its rotation around an imaginary line called the figure axis. The Earth’s mass is balanced around the figure axis, and it wobbles as it spins. That wobble naturally changes one metre a year due to moving glaciers and ocean currents. The 2011 Tohuku earthquake moved the ocean bed near Japan as much as 16 metres vertically and 50 metres horizontally – that’s the equivalent horizontal distance of an Olympic swimming pool! The shifting ocean bed increased Earth’s wobble around the figure axis by 17 centimetres. As the wobble grew, Earth sped up its rotation. It’s the same principle as when a figure skater pulls their arms closer to their body in order to spin faster.
It seems to me that a certain $FPOCA has a major crush on a certain mom! And as a result of that, got our Facebook page torn down yesterday!? It won’t matter anyhow. because you’ve only given us more fuel to continue on and on and on and on, just you wait!?
Which is why, I feel compelled to make my 100th post on wordpress.com all the more special!
So let’s start with a nice slideshow!
This slideshow requires JavaScript.
^ Yep, that about sums it up just nicely!
Now for some pseudo-code:
ES="Ewa Sonnet"
TRESH="$ES is a person: Who is \« Very Allergic \» to any \
\“ self-reflective \” criticism, which is why we're here! \
To help keep you reminding of this \« little \» inconvenient \“ \
character flaw (one of many) \” of yours\!"
echo "$TRESH"
The resulting output:
Ewa Sonnet is a person: Who is « Very Allergic » to any “ self-reflective ” criticism, which is why we’re here! To help keep you reminding of this « little » inconvenient “ character flaw (one of many) ” of yours!
As I wrote yesterday onmy tumblr: (And the whole reason and point of me reblogging this here.)
I’m sorry I didn’t had the time before, to respond any sooner! Since I’ve a life to live too. I don’t “ hate ” the deluded woman who goes by the ‘artistic’ name of Ewa Sonnet, but who in reality is named Beata Dąbrowska. It’s, beyond a reasonable doubt, what she represents that I hate, resent and detest. Coupled with the things I know and which have been said behind the scenes.
This is so unlike me who simply posts his expressions publicly. Dangerous? Well maybe, but that time has come where diplomacy has failed (and we HAVE TRIED!). That subtle hints have fallen on deaf ears. And to {make,complicate} matters even more. Us (former fans) simply not being allowed to speak or comment freely on their wall!?
IMHO: There’s a BIG difference in simply posting negative sounding comments (I’d remove those too!) and not wanting to be reminded of «an inconvenient» truth. A truth more and more people are going to hear about and if they care enough share with others!? Then they will start to ask their own questions too. What are you going to do, if this happens?
Block those people as well!?
Report their profiles for being fake, like you did with my girlfriend’s profile or perhaps you let one of your goons do that for you!?
Message their SO(s) and talk trash about theirs!? This all in order to “ dissect ” a happy and innocent relationship!? <- I believe there’s a special seat reserved in hell for peepz who do so!?
Honestly: I’ve had it with the bullshit!
Of course, then there’s the “ baseless accusation ” of this group being part of … or much simpler a bunch of ‘nolife’ having “ creative terrorists ”!? I’m sure and I know I’m not speaking for just myself here, but we all do have our own lives to attend to.
It’s a dirty shirt, so somebody has got to wash it. *Olives anyone*
You’re just a … FREAK!
April fools! It’s no joke indeed.
This is just one of many sparks your little dramas have caused. And I’m sure many more will follow.
« People! It’s all just Smoke(s) and Mirrors! »
Hellraiser Part 4 ~ Bloodlines!
Introducing: Ewa’s Goon Squad minus the heroes who call out on their bullshit!
And she ain’t laughing about it, simply because she can’t! He he he!
Speaking of being ‘two-faced’. You should thank us, for providing you with this public service!
Picture to the left: The ES entity, as you came to know it, BEFORE.
« Anyone ever seen the series Alien Nation!? » *donotmixthegenes*
Introducing: The :@ss she never had…
She really does look very depressed in this one! I’ll bet ‘her’ new website will be equally as depressing and void of any human warmth! *very sad*
The key to success – The bitch please edition! LOL!
Now we understand why this set will never be released.
« Bitch Please » …
Just for laughs! XD
« To go along with all the fake updates of Ewa Sonnet’s social networks (latest update is from august2012), here is a New promo for her New update from her failed album. »
« Sometimes changing perspectives changes everything » …
Someone should be humble and learn to take advice, like {he,she} takes a Dick! :@)
Does this look like the self-proclaimed: « Classy, well mannered, very disciplined and “ world famous ” model »? Who’s known by her project-name’s alter-ego of “ Ewa Sonnet ”
Nah, I don’t think so either… Or was she just having a bad day that day and the camera just happened to “ immortalize ” this moment for “ eternity ”…? If so, then you just ran out of luck here, ’cause the whole ‘verse is going to know this “ endearing moment ” too!
« All I’m offering is the truth … »
still do prefer Carrie Fisher’s portrayal of Leia though! For one: She put forth a very feisty personality, this instead of dumbrowska’s meager attempt at trying to be ‘all that’ (and possibly more).
Sexy!? Right!? *With a Johnny Bravo Frown*
Just keep flushing.
Heritage: A mixture of Austrian with a toad of Polish.
Dumbfounded, Dumbstruck, Dumbrowska.
What is ‘bloatware’!?
Please do keep asking ‘her’ yourself… Like say: How’s about a refund!?
Food for thought…
I’d say there are plenty of boobs out there to …. :-)
Ha Ha Ha … !
Do you like this never published before picture of me? – NO!
…Now at least you know why I’ve pulled all my posts. Not because I’m against nudity or anything remotely related to the subject. I.e. I’m not a choir boy either. However, I’m a big proponent of informed consensus. Which to me applies to more areas in life than for example an area of life, what some of you might call “sleazy” GWC fauxtography.
I said to be continued in my previous post, and as I do tend to keep my promises. So here it is…
As the good Facebooker that I am, I’ve my fair share of apps I use regularly either on – or off FB that is. Now I happened to stumble upon this article yesterday. <- Maybe this’ll explain to my readers, why I’ve the need to write about these subject(s).
FWIW: I neither agree nor disagree with the author.
Why? Because at first I’d interpret this ad as: As taken from real life. Whether this is a grim reality (as portrayed rather effectively in the accompanying pictures) for those involved or not. It is there whether you like it or not. And yes it doesn’t sell, simply because it doesn’t appeal (to a regular person). In short: a more honest storytelling doesn’t sell, or… does it?
What fascinates me, is the need for fairy-tale-telling and the preferred realness of phantasy. Yes I know how marketing works and yes I do know how to sell ‘things’ [except for myself of course. ] Thus I can understand and even appreciate a well lit, better styled and better clothed model(s) in a prearranged setting more, than the portrayed “zef-side” here. Why? Because I know it takes time to set up the right props in the setting of your choosing with the lighting of your choosing. <- A professional artist could give you a better description of how this works properly, more than I can.
Q: So why all of a sudden have you decided to go on what appears to be «a crusade» against declining moral? A: No, I haven’t!? Or what makes you think that I do… I’ll repeat here what I’ve stated so many times before. In order to organize my thoughts and feelings about whatever subject I’m writing about. I have the need to write about it. As such I tend to view my writings as merely descriptions of whatever it is what’s currently on my mind. Needless to say perhaps, but I do tend to write off (to be taken literally as well as figuratively) what’s on my chest and move on thereafter… Q: So it’s a matter of moral vs morale? A: That’s exactly right! It’s not like I’m in the perfect position to pass judgment on or about what other people do. But this doesn’t prevent me from expressing my stance on the matter, nor should I ever feel dissuaded in doing so. Q: So what is your stance on the matter? A1: It should be self-evident that I clearly view photography and fauxtography as two separate entities with only one common denominator, namely the use of a camera. A2: As a result of this separation of privileges, I discern strongly in between one aspect of photography which causes astonishment, awe or insert any other feeling not necessarily related to sexuality and the other which has the simple goal of causing physical arousal. Please note: I do tend to view neither of them as neither right nor wrong. <- But confusing, yes to say the least… A3: As I hinted at before. If both (or more) parties involved have a gay old time doing the things they both love to do best, then who am I to disrupt such plays.
As I posted on facebook!
"'Amateur' sleaze is a tired aesthetic in this age of air-brushed nostalgia"
~ Indeed it is! Unfortunately however this could be more true for those who work in this particular niche than others who don't.
Perhaps to be continued as well… But after Easter that’s for sure…
I’m sure some of my regular readers will have noticed that I’ve pulled away all (if not most) post I had on my blog regarding the luscious illusion called ES by some and TRES by others.
«It's the smell, ...»
Of course I’ve my reasons, of which here is one that should stand out, for this as well.
Since I have it on good authority, that all criticism is gratefully received. I’m sure ‘she’ won’t mind me telling you my POV now.
«Q: What's that? - A: Good authority.»
First things first though. Let me state that I’ve no grudge or ill will towards the referred to person!
Q: She has become a «persona non grata» then? A: Nah, not really. I believe it suffices to say that I got «sucker punched» last year into believing that I was dealing with the real thing.
Q: Why is that you say? A: Well… let’s for example take this sample from one of her interviews she did for CKM in 2005 (or 2006 I’m not certain.):
Dzięki tej pracy mogę, przynajmniej na razie, dokładać do kariery wokalnej.
Thanks to this work I can, at least for now, add to a vocal career.
^ All this plus based on my own interactions with her, led me to believe that I was dealing with a sweet and kind young Polish woman, who wanted nothing more than to earn a few extra bucks, so she could pick up her singing career again. A career which she had parted with as of late 2007?
Lately however I’ve come to believe everything referring to this noble and worthy goal has been nothing more than an elaborate and rather ingenious way to promote only that which would give her those bucks in the first place. Now I’ll ask you this! Wouldn’t it have been simpler to simply say so! In order to save me and possibly many others the time and effort to help you promote yourself back into good graces on all available social media sites out there. Please note: I did just say «I believe this to be the case»! One of the many grounds I base this believe on is the complete lack of any new singing material being put forth. Rather as a former VIP member of this so called hidden group, I’ve only been shown a new and upcoming amateur starlet for busty.pl and an increasing desire to promote her on behalf of ES onto sites you wouldn’t want anything to do with.
Q: What sites do you mean? A: The type which seem populated by nothing other than the misogynistic type of people who seem to get a kick out of demeaning and degrading women in favor of a few bucks they seem to earn by being a so called “affiliate” to this or that {soft,hard}core website. Honestly though, while I’m the type of person who would say: «Whatever floats your boat as long as it doesn’t sink mine.» (Which is BTW: an interesting way of saying “to live and let live”) But if you expect me to believe this to refer to her, or even that this bears her seal of approval, well think again because I {sincerely,highly} doubt it. <- Then again: That’s just me, what do I know right…!?
Which is why, among things, I have for you a bunch of recent posts:
(To peruse through, at a time of your leisure.)
^ As a last: Isn’t it amazing how much some, emotional charged attempt at persuasion, message appears to spark me to write so much.
As a last I’ve no intend to start a smear campaign or even consider to start one. Honestly, I’ve got better things to do with my time! The posts I’ve recently written up are nothing more than an attempt on my part to fathom or an attempt to understand why people do the things they do. This without implying this is currently being done. Because that would constitute slander or libel on my part. What I want is for people to make up their own minds in regards to their dealings with either me or for example the woman I’ve tried my best at to put in the bests of light possible ever since last year.
Now at least you know why I’ve pulled all my posts. Not because I’m against nudity or anything remotely related to the subject. I.e. I’m not a choir boy either. However, I’m a big proponent of informed consensus. Which to me applies to more areas in life than for example an area of life, which some of you might call the “sleazy” GWC fauxtography niche. Which some might unjustly equate to good photography. <- The only resemblance it has with professional photography is the use of a camera, nothing more.
But there are a few things I don’t like. For one: the way Facebook handles its outbound links. I.e. I’m used to see the link displayed (on hover) in clear text. But when I choose to copy the link address instead, a feat I often use, I get this junk:
Well I sought to end this madness by writing a little script which removes all the unnecessary junk and gives me back my transparent Internet, the way I like it. So while I can understand why Facebook uses this strategy, for one it’s a nice way to keep track of its users. I feel it interferes too much with the way how I use Facebook.
strip()
{
## We might not want to run this as root!?
if [ $USER = root ]; then
echo -e ${Red}"\tAre you Insane!\n${Cyan}\tError: In order to use this script, one must NOT be $USER.\n${Yellow}\tExiting..."${Nc}
## The following will kick you out from a 'root-session', i.e. you used 'sudo -s' to become root.
## The '-s' flag implies that you can use (ifdef) your aliases and functions in the new env.
exit 0
else
echo -e ${Blue}"\t${USER} may proceed.\n${Cyan}\tMay peace be with you."${Nc}
fi
clear
## I use the following folder/directory for convenience's sake.
## E.g. the file used by sed is placed here.
if [ ! -d "$HOME/.usr/etc" ];then mkdir -p "$HOME"/.usr/etc;fi
## Let's define the following file then.
sed_txt="$HOME/.usr/etc/sed.txt"
## And create it, if necessary.
if [ ! -f "$sed_txt" ];then
cat >>"$sed_txt"<<_EOF_
s_\(.*\)?url=__
s_\(.*\)&url=__
s_\(.*\)l.php?u=__
s_&domain=\(.*\)__
s_&ei=\(.*\)__
s_\(.*\)&rl=NONE&u=__
s_&rid=\(.*\)__
s_&h=\(.*\)__
s_?fb\_\(.*\)__
s_%20__g
s_%23_#_
s_%26_\&_g
s_%2B_+_
s_%2C_,_g
s_%2F_/_g
s_%3A_:_
s_%3B_;_g
s_%3D_=_g
s_%3F_?_g
s_%5B_[_g
s_%5D_]_g
s_%7B_{_g
s_%7D_}_g
s_\ __g
_EOF_
fi
if [ -z "$1" ];then
echo -e ${Blue}"\t(Hit \"${Yellow}ctrl+shift+v${Blue}\" to paste.)\n"${Nc}
echo -en ${Yellow}"\tPlease enter your url: "${Nc}
read Name
if [ -z "$Name" ];then echo -e ${Red}"\tPlease provide me with a string to work on."${Nc}
else
[ -n "$Name" ];Name="$Name"
fi
fi
## If 'Name' is not zero or null then...
if [ -n "$1" ];then Name="$1";fi
## Echo 'Name' to sed and remove the bollocks.
Name=$(echo "$Name" | sed -f "$sed_txt")
## If the links are pasted into a file, then...
## Replace previously mentioned bollocks 'in place' (the '-i' flag)
if [ -f "$1" ];then Name="$1";sed -f "$sed_txt" -i "$1";fi
## I'm only interested in the 'watch?v=blablablala' part,
## when it comes to youtube.
if [ -n "$(echo "$Name" |grep 'youtube')" ];then
echo -e ${Magenta}"\t${Name%%&*}"
## Also interested when it's a link pointing to facebook.
elif [ -n "$(echo "$Name" |grep 'facebook')" ];then
echo -e ${Blue}"\t"$Name""${Nc}
else echo -e ${Cyan}"\t"$Name""${Nc}
fi
}
Usage:
## Usage:
## 'interactive'
# 1.
strip
## paste in url after being prompted.
# 2.
strip 'your.url'
## Don't forget to 'quote' your url.
## Though "..." will work too I recommend you to use '...'
## 'non-interactive'
## You've pasted in a lot of links in somefile.txt and then...
# 3.
strip somefile.txt
For convenience sake I’ve put this one in my ‘$HOME/.bash_functions‘, as evidenced by the screenshots. I’m sharing this with you. Because: You might find it {amusing,useful,helpful,entertaining,*}!? Or because I’m just a nice guy who feels that sharing means caring.
## Insert a new line into '$HOME/.bashrc'
echo >> $HOME/.bashrc
## Or simply hit 'ctrl+d' instead of using '<<_EOF_' here.
cat >> $HOME/.bashrc<<_EOF_
# Define some colors first:
# 30=black 31=red 32=green 33=yellow 34=blue 35=magenta 36=cyan 37=white
export Black="\033[0;30m"
export Red="\033[0;31m"
export Green="\033[0;32m"
export Yellow="\033[1;33m"
export Blue="\033[1;34m"
export Magenta="\033[1;35m"
export Cyan="\033[1;36m"
export White="\033[1;37m"
export Nc="\033[0m" # No Color
# --> Nice. Has the same effect as using "ansi.sys" in DOS.
_EOF_
## Insert a new line into '$HOME/.bashrc'
echo >> $HOME/.bashrc
## Or simply hit 'ctrl+d' instead of using '<<_EOF_' here.
## The following will enable to use the function as described below.
cat >> $HOME/.bashrc<<_EOF_
# Functions: check for a separate function file, and if we find one
# source it.
if [ -f ~/.bash_functions ]; then
. ~/.bash_functions
fi
_EOF_
And for the astute reader: Yes I write my posts and comments in a text-editor before I publish them on Facebook, because this has at least two major benefits.
1. I’ve got spell check enabled. I know many English words by heart sure, but a ‘failsafe’ like this comes in quite handy.
2. I can order and format my text more properly!!!
I didn’t know I could simply install Skype on my current system. Until I read a friend’s story about Skype becoming a possible necessity to communicate. And I figured let’s do a search, as I often do. To see if I can both enable myself again, and as a result accommodate anyone using Skype, to make calls. Fyi, it is like 6 years ago since I’ve used Skype anyway.
Alrighty then. The first step I usually take is to browse the Ubuntu community pages, they really contain a wealth of information, a community who has at many times proven to be very very useful for me.
Viva la commonwealth and ecosphere that compromises among many the symbol/system Ubuntu. The ‘face’ of the body so to speak, or better put which gives the Ubuntu symbol Her depth.
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Skype
Now the first hurdle comes along. Yep, I already know Skype is proprietary but so be it. Because if so many users use this protocol, then it becomes an: “If you can’t beat them, then join them” strategy. As the motivated reader that I am, who always wishes to make informed decisions, I read on….
Maybe I shouldn’t have! Because now I don’t feel like enabling Skype anymore. Yes I know most articles I pointed out are old. Yes I know things may have changed for the better, but most likely they haven’t!?
“I know from investigating eBay fraud cases that eBay has probably the most generous policy of any internet company when it comes to sharing information. We do not require a subpoena except for very limited circumstances. We require a subpoena when we need the financial information from the site, credit card info or sometimes IP information. … So, that really opens the door for us. That means that what our policy is that if you are law enforcement agency you can fax us on your letterhead to request information: who is that beyond the seller ID, who is beyond this user ID. We give you their name, their address, their e-mail address and we can give you their sales history without a subpoena. … We will probably tell you too that you might want to get a subpoena because we are looking for credit card info and you ask that. … We also do other things to facilitate your investigation by looking and doing some searches around on our own, typically to see if there are some other user ID’s associated with that thing. … We are doing a lot of work with law enforcement agencies.”
Now make up Your own minds!?
That’s all folks…
Kindest regards,
Alex
PS: Comments allowed (those (if any) will be {monitored,moderated} by yours truly) && these will have to relate to what I might call “state-related” to the subject at hand!
On a side note: While I do appreciate people who tell me they liked what I wrote about or how they have followed my blog for a while. The best way IMO to show Your appreciation is by simply clicking ‘like‘ on my post(s) (and share them with… ), or just follow my blog instead.
There are three rules for writing a novel. Unfortunately, no one knows what they are.
— W. Somerset Maugham
Well if She did then She has had good reasons to do so!
Because in all likelihood you indeed were rude or your writings, about Her person, were pejorative.
Ask yourselves, would you accept the same treatment!? I think not! I am certain I’d not!!
If a Facebook page could be considered the virtual equivalent of one’s living room, then you should behave accordingly!
Then there is this baloney about freedom of speech (or the lack of it on Ewa’s page). You’re entitled to express yourselves in any way as you see fit, as a consequence creating your page and possible even more is your right as well.
But You as a consequence are fully responsible for those expressions and derivative creations! Thus one expresses oneself in a manner you’d probably not do in real life. The consequence: You get banned. It is as simple as that. You create a page on here that doesn’t meet Facebook’s guidelines: As a consequence your page gets reported. You do know that the copyrighted material you’ve used doesn’t belong to you!?
Since they wanted freedom of speech. I’ve given them just that. Since I am entitled to use my inalienable rights as well.
“Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.”
“Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”
“Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.”
That’s all folks…
Kindest regards,
Alex
PS: Comments allowed (those (if any) will be {monitored,moderated} by yours truly) && these will have to relate to what I might call “state-related” to the subject at hand!
On a side note: While I do appreciate people who tell me they liked what I wrote about or how they have followed my blog for a while. The best way IMO to show Your appreciation is by simply clicking ‘like‘ on my post(s) (and share them with… ), or just follow my blog instead.
There are three rules for writing a novel. Unfortunately, no one knows what they are.
— W. Somerset Maugham
Thanks in no small part to all of you who took action and lent your voices, we won a temporary reprieve in the fight against SOPA, the Stop Online Piracy Act. Our message — that SOPA would create blacklists for online censorship, harm cybersecurity efforts, set bad international precedent, and lead to a fractured Internet — couldn’t be ignored. The markup has been suspended until late January, when SOPA and its companion bill in the Senate, PIPA (Protect IP Act), will be back.
The markup suspension is an important victory, but the blacklist bills are not dead yet. More than ever, we need your help to preserve Internet freedom.
EFF has worked hard to ensure that this dangerous legislation didn’t slip through under the public radar. From our initial coverage of Hollywood’s blacklist legislation, to our action alert urging individuals to contact Congress, to our participation in a Week of Action Against Censorship, to our up-to-the-minute live tweeting of last week’s SOPA markup @EFFlive, EFF has been on the frontlines of this fight, and, with your support, we’re ready to continue with newed vigor when Congress returns in the new year.
Please help EFF protect your freedom to create, innovate, and connect by becoming an annual member at https://supporters.eff.org/join/2011 or by giving a year-end gift at https://supporters.eff.org/donate/2011. And your gift can be automatically doubled by a matching grant from the Brin Wojcicki Foundation when you donate and check the “EFF on Mission” box.
What I want is for people to make up their own minds in regards to their dealings with either me or for example the woman 
